Atheists will ask for the proof of God’s existence. Many Christians will give the Atheist the “design argument”, “Ontological argument”, “Pascal’s Wager”, and/or their own personal experience. The problem with these arguments is that it makes the Atheist the judge and jury of whether or not God exists. These arguments leave the decision in the hands of the non-believer to determine if God is real or imaginary, fraud or true, hoax or Creator. But God’s existence is not determined by his creation. God is God regardless of what we think or say.
Beyond this, giving the Atheist evidence goes against Scripture, because the Atheist already knows that God exists:
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. (Romans 1:18-20, ESV)
According to the Word of God, everyone knows that God exists, but they are suppressing the truth with their unrighteousness. So, the Atheist doesn’t need us to prove God exists. What we need to do is point out the inconsistency of their worldview. So, let’s look at the question many Atheists pose to Christians, “What proof do you have that God exists?”
Here is my answer to the Atheist. The concept of proof, presumes the laws of logic. By nature, the laws of logic are universal, immaterial, and unchanging. The answer to the Atheist’s question lies here.
We all have presuppositions. However, many people never stop to think about whether their presuppositions are consistent with their worldview. Most Atheists and Agnostics hold to Naturalism. Unfortunately for the Naturalist, laws of logic, which one needs to use to have any proof of anything, cannot not fit into their worldview. Unchanging, universal, and immaterial laws fly in the face of Naturalism. Their worldview cannot withstand the assumptions of their own inquiry for proof, because they assume the laws of logic are valid without validating them.
So, the answer to the Atheist is this…the fact that they are asking for proof proves that God exists, because only the Christian worldview with an eternal, unchanging, and immaterial Creator, can account for immaterial, unchanging, and universal laws which are needed for proof.
Thanks for Reading,
Well, it has been a long time since I have posted on my blog, and God willing, I will be able to post more frequently. Since I have been away from the keyboard, I have done a lot of reading, listening, and learning. Recently, I just finished R.C. Sproul’s book, The Truth of the Cross (As I am writing this it is FREE for Kindle). I really enjoyed the book because it highlighted some truths about Jesus death that I needed to know. It also was great because it cost me nothing to read it! Anyway, something Dr. Sproul wrote struck me profoundly when he after he discussed our need to be perfect in order to be in the presence of a holy God:
We try to get around the helplessness of this situation in modern culture by declaring that everybody deserves a second chance. -(Kindle Locations 226-229). Kindle Edition.
Today, many churches are talking about how God is the God of second chances. You may be asking, “What’s wrong with that?” And that is a great question. The problem with a second chance is that for corrupt and sinful human beings a second chance would be futile. It is pointless for a holy and righteous God who knows everything to give fallen people a second chance because they will inevitably mess up again. A second chance doesn’t save anyone, it only provides another opportunity to fail. If the standard for being with God forever is perfection, a second chance from God doesn’t equal perfection. Sproul follows his statement with these words:
My response is, “Who says so?” Does justice require that everybody get a second chance? A second chance is grace. It is mercy. Grace and mercy are never deserved. So it is nonsense to say that everyone deserves a second chance. But even if that nonsensical, hypothetical condition were true, what good would it do us? How long ago did we use up our second chance?
Sproul highlights the problem with second chances. We, sinful human beings, will eventually blow that second chance. A second chance from a holy God may be gracious and merciful, but it makes no sense because God also knows that we will trade that second chance in for rebellion.
What you and I need is not a second chance, but a savior. A savior that is perfect, holy, and upright in the sight of the Father. We need a savior that can take our place and stand on our behalf before the Creator of heaven and earth. Thankfully, there is a Savior. His name is Jesus and he is the only one that can save.
For our sake he made him [Jesus] to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. -2 Corinthians 5:21, ESV
The only way to God is righteousness. You don’t need a second chance, you need Jesus!
Thanks for reading.
I have heard a lot of people say that gay people can’t change. Well, Rosaria Champagne Butterfield’s testimony refutes that view. Here is her story found on the Authors on the Line podcast (23 minutes):
Jesus’ death on the cross was sufficient to forgive anyone’s sins…that includes you!
Thanks for reading/listening